Honors student Sreshta Appalabattula began her academic journey in technology, but over time, became increasingly drawn to the question of how law can keep pace with rapid innovation. Based on her experience in the UW Honors Program and informatics, Sreshta reflected, “I was encouraged to think more critically about the societal and ethical dimensions of the fields I was studying, which played a key role in my shift toward policy and legal studies.”

Sreshta added, “When I arrived at the University of Washington, I was surprised to find that, despite a large and active pre-law community, there was no platform for undergraduates to publish their work. At the same time, many students, especially those from STEM backgrounds, were not always encouraged to engage with the legal implications of their fields.” Motivated by this gap, Sreshta founded the Undergraduate Law Review with a few peers as an interdisciplinary space where students from all backgrounds can explore and publish work related to law. 

In just a month, they revived the organization from the ground up, recruiting an executive and editorial team of 10+ students and a writers team of 15+ students, securing RSO status, and currently developing their inaugural Spring 2026 edition. Follow @uwuglawreview on Instagram or reach out to ulawreview@uw.edu for more information!

The post Honors student revives the Undergraduate Law Review appeared first on University of Washington Honors Program.

Congratulations to second-year Honors student Sophia Kawamura and recent Honors graduate Claire Cho on their recognition at the International Conference for the Fantastic in the Arts (ICFA) in Florida! The ICFA is devoted to all forms of the fantastic across literature, film, and the other arts.

Sophia earned first place for the Must Reads Book Award, while Claire was named third runner-up. Honors first-year Finn Hoebelheinrich and second-year Lena Korn were also recognized as honorable mentions. At the conference, they presented readings of their work and participated in a range of academic panels focused on speculative fiction.

All students submitted their work through Professor Rachel Sobel’s Honors course, Writing Speculative Fiction from Life and Research. 

The post Representing Honors at the International Conference for the Fantastic in the Arts appeared first on University of Washington Honors Program.

Each year, the University of Washington recognizes 100 students whose academic journeys demonstrate personal growth and transformation. These students actively engage with their communities, lead with purpose, and take on complex, often ambiguous challenges. From volunteering at a community food forest to contributing to NASA’s LISA mission, these Honors Huskies are applying what they learned to make an impact across their UW experience. 

This year, the following 28 students from the Honors Program were named to the 2026 Husky 100:

Maya Falodia ’27 is pursuing a Bachelor of Science in Computer Science with a minor in Disability Studies. As part of the Honors Program, she was a Peer Facilitator, helped with the Honors Peer Mentoring Program, worked as a recruitment ambassador, and now is a Student Assistant. She also serves as Vice Chair of Minorities in Technology. Maya has conducted research with the Taskar Center for Accessible Technology in the Allen School and is currently conducting research on Open Source Projects related to accessibility in the Make4All Lab. She also went on a study abroad in Rome, Italy, where she analyzed the access and inclusion of Rome and its transit systems.

Anika Neumeyer ’27 is pursuing a Bachelor of Arts in English and Law, Societies, and Justice. She has been involved with the Interdisciplinary Honors Program as a Communications Intern, Peer Facilitator, and Student Assistant. Beyond Honors, Anika serves on the Executive Board of UW Dawg Pack and works as a social media intern at the University Book Store. She also led a book drive in collaboration with UW Athletics and studied abroad with the LSJ Amsterdam program, where she studied public school segregation in Seattle and Amsterdam. 

Q&A with Maya and Anika

What does being recognized as a Husky 100 mean to you personally?

Maya: I feel grateful to be recognized and proud. Husky 100 is a goal I set for myself my first year after I saw friends and mentors I really looked up to get recognized as Husky 100. To me, Husky 100 represents students who are using their education and skills to make the world around them a better place, which is what I’m trying to do! I was excited when I found out I achieved my goal of being part of Husky 100.

Anika: This award helps me feel more confident in my goals to tackle literacy, censorship, and educational policy—topics which I often feel are side-lined. It also means that my work and efforts toward these topics/interests/areas have been recognized at UW. This award doesn’t only recognize myself, but also all the communities and programs I am connected to here at the UW that have made it possible for me to achieve this. I am proud that I can represent them with this award. 

Reflecting on your time at UW, is there a moment, experience, or activity that reshaped how you see yourself or your future? What did you take away from it?

Maya: One important moment of my time at UW was related to being a peer facilitator. As a peer facilitator, I had to put together a panel of current and alum Honors students for my Honors 100 section. One of the panelists was a UW alum, who majored in Disability Studies. After the panel, I talked with her a bit, as I was really interested in Disability Studies but didn’t know a lot about the program. I set up a coffee chat with her, where I learned more about her path and classes she recommended. It is partly because of her I am minoring in Disability Studies and why I went on the specific study abroad I did. This experience showed me how new connections can come from anywhere and anyone, and that I wanted to pursue Disability Studies.

Anika: One of the most vital experiences to my time at UW was the Communications Internship with the UW Honors Program. Looking back, this role really gave me the first stepping stone at UW and helped me immerse myself in a program that would guide my time here. Everything I have accomplished at UW stemmed from that first role in Honors: whether it was the development of a digital portfolio that landed me a Social Media internship at University Book Store, my mentor’s encouragement to study abroad with LSJ, or the Community Spotlights student interviews motivating me to create my own Mary Gates Leadership project.

In what ways has UW prepared you for what’s next, and how do you hope to carry those experiences forward?

Maya: UW has offered me so many experiences, from research to studying abroad to leadership roles. All of these experiences have helped me develop and gain skills like public speaking, project management, being adaptable, and strong technical knowledge. A lot of my experiences are linked by the common threads of proactive inclusion and accessibility. I hope to carry these guiding principles forward in whatever I do next. After graduation, I plan to work as a software engineer, with hopes that I can bring my skillset from minoring in Disability Studies and doing research in accessible technology into the tech world. I’m going back to Disney for my second internship this summer, so I could see myself returning to Disney full time. However, I am also interested in working at non-profit organizations or doing research related to accessibility in industry.

Anika: My time at UW has really opened my eyes to the opportunities that arise when you approach things with an open interdisciplinary mindset. I really found my path here at UW when I began drawing things from both my English and LSJ courses and thinking about how they could work together, whether in assignments or larger extracurricular projects. My experiences here have taught me to believe in the conviction of my ideas and my own ability to achieve them. Moving forward, I will take this belief and interdisciplinary mindset with me in my future pursuits and goals. After graduation, I plan to pursue an M.A. in English Literature before moving onto law school. I want to eventually serve as a First Amendment lawyer to fight book bans and censorship.

What advice would you give to the next generation of Honors students?

Maya: Always be open to new opportunities and new connections! You never know when a new classmate, friend, or mentor will connect you to your next passion or interest. I think it’s important to try new things and experiences to figure out what you want to do, and it will often take a lot of experiences to figure out what that is (I’m still figuring it out). While it’s important to be open to opportunities and connections and to say yes to them, remember to take care of yourself and take time to rest.

Anika: I would say to try everything that you can or are interested in because there isn’t anything to lose if you don’t get a club leadership position or onto a certain research project. Don’t be afraid to ask people for help or support if you have an idea. You never know when you might surprise yourself and get an opportunity that perhaps you might’ve scared yourself off of if you hadn’t put yourself out there.

The post 28 Honors students named to the 2026 Husky 100 appeared first on University of Washington Honors Program.

For first-year Honors student Mahika “Mahi” Malladi, a typical Fall weekend meant helping lead a city council campaign, organizing canvassers, and educating voters throughout the election process. Mahi served as campaign manager for Shilpa Prem’s 2025 Kirkland City Council Position 3 race, a role that reinforced for her the importance of participating in local elections. Reflecting on this experience, Mahi shared, “Even as a freshman student, learning how to articulate yourself in an environment of pressure is so valuable—not only in your personal development as a person of color who is teaching the world to take us seriously, but in politics in which our humanity is debated.”

With Mahi’s leadership and the broader campaign team’s efforts, Kirkland elected its first South Asian woman to City Council, winning by more than 650 votes. She was also recognized as a Campaign Heroine by the National Women’s Caucus (WA Chapter). Mahi notes, “Democracy is not easily sustained. We hold such strength navigating racially aggressive discussions and continue to come out month after month to champion our values.”

The post First-year Honors student helps elect Kirkland’s first South Asian councilwoman appeared first on University of Washington Honors Program.

After noticing that menopausal experiences are frequently underrepresented in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) research, Tanvi Kale began writing a systematic review on IBD and menopause in 2024. Now a senior, she reflects on this work as part of our Community Spotlight series.

Conducted through the UW Gastrointestinal Health and Wellness Lab under the mentorship of Dr. Kendra Kamp, the project synthesizes clinical and epidemiological literature to examine how hormonal changes during menopause may influence IBD symptoms, disease activity, and quality of life. Tanvi’s work has since shaped her broader academic interests in health equity, gender-based disparities in medicine, and patient-centered care. Reflecting on the project, Tanvi shared, “As an Honors student, I’ve been motivated to pursue work that goes beyond the classroom to address real-world gaps in knowledge, and this review grew directly out of that mindset. I hope sharing this work can highlight how Honors students engage deeply with complex topics and use research as a tool for advocacy, connection, and impact within and beyond the UW community.”

Tanvi’s review was published in February 2025 in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Read her review here.

The post Honors student advances research on inflammatory bowel disease and menopause appeared first on University of Washington Honors Program.

Honors Portfolios:

Nia Brice

This site incorporates my Interdisciplinary Honors and Husky Leadership Portfolios which highlighting my undergraduate experiences at the University of Washington while completing a double degree in Medical Anthropology and Global Health (BA) and Biology (BS) with college honors. In my free time I enjoy committing to an old-lady lifestyle which includes reading books, cross-stitching, and visiting museums while never missing an episode of my favorite reality tv shows!

​This portfolio is organized like a museum with each tab being an ‘exhibit’ that highlighting a key reflection of mine, to learn more about this organization read the Museum Map below. Please wander through at your own pace and thank you for joining me!

Marilea Hernandez

My name is Mariela Hernandez, and I am a third year student at the University of Washington in Seattle. I study General Biology with Interdisciplinary Honors. Throughout my honors portfolio, I collected artifacts, pictures, and memories from my undergraduate years. Feel free to look through my portfolio that details my UW experience!

Jaya Field

This portfolio is the culmination of my four years at the University of Washington, and was created as a final project for my time in the Interdisciplinary Honors Program. Through this portfolio I chronicle the peaks and valleys of each quarter I have spent at the university (or abroad), and in doing so reflect on how I have evolved as a student, researcher, friend, and community member over this time period. 

A little about me, I am graduating in March 2026 with a BA in Law, Societies & Justice and BA in International Studies with Interdisciplinary Honors. Originally from Evanston, Illinois, I chose to move to Seattle and attend UW largely because of my acceptance to the Interdisciplinary Honors Program. As a senior in high school I felt constrained by the idea of choosing a major, and loved the prospect of being able to continue to learn about topics outside of my intended area of study. I have been able to take advantage of so many incredible opportunities through Honors, from studying abroad in Peru to moderating the Honors program’s annual Global Challenges event. As I am now in my last quarter of my college experience, I feel immensely grateful to the folks in the Honors program for the way they have shaped me as a person. Enjoy my portfolio!

Research Abstracts:

Joey Arens – A Critical Queer-y Into the Capture of the LGBTQ+ Movement

Within the span of a century, homosexuals in the United States went from pathologized persons with “sociopathic personality disturbances” to revered as “strengthe[ning] the institution of marriage” by the nation’s highest court. This thesis – diverging from prototypical analyses that esteem the “glamorous” and meteoric rise of gay rights – reveals undemocratic normative, institutional, and material intra-movement power asymmetries that informed the movement’s trajectory alteration in its priorities, agenda, and tactics. The dearth of scholarship – failing to mend critical philanthropy studies with LGBTQ+ social movement history – permits the clandestine impacts of private foundations and institutional power asymmetries to be underexamined, thereby reifying the invisibilized omnipresence of force relations inherent in those social movements embedded in a capitalist substructure. This thesis deploys a multi-method approach, integrating quantitative financial data from grant-making foundations to LGBTQ+ causes with qualitative, critical “bottom-up” analysis, with foci on the covert vicissitudes of power archived in the Freedom to Marry Oral Histories and other primary sources. This thesis identifies and dissects three junctures of “movement capture.” The quintessential, conditional funding influxes predicated upon acquiescence to the funder’s priorities, which were substantially dictated by the Civil Marriage Collaborative (CMC), who bestowed the movement with nearly a third of the movement’s monetary budget attained from foundations ($393,138,889). Secondly, the CMC’s affixation to institutional nodes of power – particularly formal sociopolitical channels and the pre-existing sway of the Litigators Roundtable – which thereby bestowed a degree of legitimization for their demands at the expense of more liberatory avenues that reject the reification or replication of hegemonic power. And finally, the portrayal and “advertisement” of the(ir) movement to the public(s) that paradoxically occluded LGBTQ+ self-advocacy in the name of political expediency for gay rights. These findings give further credence that axiom that the revolution will not be funded in a climate of growing and violent wealth inequality.

Devyn Gilbert – A Tale of Two Billies: Non/Normative Masculinities in the Seattle Leather Community

Throughout the 1980s and 90s, perceptions of masculinity in the Seattle leather men community underwent various changes. My paper scrutinizes the reasons why masculine ideals expanded to be more inclusive of transgender male identities, but the same progress was not made with regard to Black men. The purpose of this project is to investigate and shed light on issues of discrimination against intersectional identities within marginalized communities. My thesis is that, in combination with political movements in the LGBTQ+ community, changes in leadership due to the AIDS epidemic made room for new forms of masculinity in the Seattle leather men community. However, those forms of masculinity were still largely normative and white. My project is a case study of two Seattle leather men with non-normative masculine identities, one from the 80s and the other from the 90s. Looking at primary sources in newspapers from the period regarding their experiences and events they were involved in, I compared the coverage of their lives and analyzed this data through the lens of erotic capital. My project found that greater willingness to discuss gender inequality than racial inequality, as well as nationwide transgender rights movements, resulted in an expanded definition of masculinity in the 1990s. This new masculinity included normative transgender male identities, but still unfairly discriminated against gay men of color. These findings are significant as they illuminate the history of racism and transphobia within the gay community that is still present today.

The post Spring Highlights of Honors Learning appeared first on University of Washington Honors Program.

Candidates should be currently enrolled in the UW Interdisciplinary Honors Program. Work hours will primarily occur between 9:00 am – 5:00 pm, M-F, in the Honors office, with some remote hours possible on Fridays. Applicants with Monday/Wednesday availability are preferred. 

In general, the duties for this job include: 

• General representation of the UW Honors Program to the public/stakeholders via phone, Zoom, email, in person as the primary reception staff.
  • Greet all guests and help to answer their question or direct them to the appropriate resource.
  • Check the general program email and voicemail each shift and help triage and respond.
• Assist with advising questions or connecting students to the Honors advisers or appropriate resource. This may include:
  • Assisting advising questions over email and the phone. 
  • Assisting with drop in advising.
  • Assisting with individual advising appointments and the flow/logistics of in-person advising.
  • Assisting with group advising sessions.
• Assist with answering admissions and program questions from prospective students and families.
• Assist with Honors communication, web updates, and social media projects. This could include:
  • Creating and disseminating weekly Honors announcements
  • Creating, organizing, improving accessibility, and updating content of web pages, artifacts, the announcements blog, and other digital communications tools
  • Monitoring Honors social media and create new posts (Instagram, Facebook, LinkedIn)
  • Assisting Honors staff in a variety of presentations to the public.
• Assist as needed with academic services and course/curriculum processes, including Honors-by-Contract & Experiential Learning communication and process management.
• Assist with scheduling Honors room reservations and managing technology checkouts associated with room reservations.
• Assist all Honors staff as needed.

Your supervisor will be Alycia Gilbert, and/or the Program Manager, and you will work closely with all Honors Program staff.

Desired Skills

• Understanding of the Interdisciplinary Honors Program requirements for undergraduate students.
• Ability to articulate the value and purpose of the Honors Program requirements.
• Ability to speak about your personal experiences at UW, and a willingness to share some of those personal experiences/stories with other students.
• Creativity and enthusiasm for supporting the Honors Program and larger UW community.
• Strong organizational and time management skills; demonstrated ability to balance a variety of activities.
• Strong writing and social media communication skills.
• Basic digital graphic design skills.
• Familiarity with WordPress or similar online publishing platforms, or a basic knowledge of HTML
• Photography/videography skills
• Demonstrated involvement on campus or in the community.
• Strong interpersonal communication skills: ability to work well with peers, new students, staff; ability to listen and respond to individuals’ questions and concerns; ability to help others problem solve and make decisions.

Compensation

Compensation is $21.30 per hour.

Dates

Spring Quarter 2026: Position will begin April 15, 2026, with a focus on onboarding and training, as well as taking part in Honors Spring events, such as graduation and Admitted Students Day. Minimum of 10-15 hours per week. 

Summer 2026: The position includes 10 remote hours of work per week during Summer 2026, with flexibility for the student employee’s availability.

Academic Year 2026-27: Autumn, Winter, and Spring at 12-15 hours per week, with an upper limit of 19.5 hours per week. Hours during the quarterly breaks may be available and will be discussed and arranged at least two weeks prior to each break. Hours will primarily occur between 9:00 am – 5:00 pm, M-F, in the Honors office, with some remote hours possible on Fridays. 

Please reach out to uwhonors@uw.edu with any questions! We’re excited to hear from you.

The post Honors Undergraduate Student Assistant appeared first on University of Washington Honors Program.

Congrats to Kaytlin Rose Vanderhorst, Carilyn Brandt, and Luna Crone-Barón on being named 2024-2025 President’s Medalists. These students were selected for their rigorous courses, number of Honors classes, and high GPAs.

All three students are in the Interdisciplinary Honors Program, and embody interdisciplinary thinking and learning, with majors ranging from psychology and education studies to english and drama. These students continue to impress with their work at the UW Farm, in storytelling, writing for the Daily, serving as peer advisers, and promoting student wellness.

Congratulations!

Click here to read the full story

The post Honors Students Named President’s Medalists appeared first on University of Washington Honors Program.

In his book Sustaining a Free Society: Roles and Responsibilities of Citizens, Leaders, and Schools, Roger Soder—Emeritus faculty member in the College of Education and Honors professor—proposes 15 essential conditions for maintaining a healthy, free society. He begins with the idea of trust. As I sat in this year’s Global Challenges – Interdisciplinary Thinking event, I found myself returning to Professor Soder’s idea again and again.

From left to right: Clara McAdams (Interdisciplinary Honors), Dr. Maralyssa Bann (Medicine), K.C. Cole (Physics/Journalism), Dr. Michelle Koutnik (Environment/Glaciology), and Dr. Jon Herron (Biology)

This year, the UW Honors Program centered its 11th annual Global Challenges event on the theme “Public Trust in Science and Why it Matters.” Each year’s topic is chosen by UW Honors students themselves, reflecting complex issues they find urgent and care about most. As a first-year Honors student interested in Public Health, I was immediately drawn to this theme. However, when I think about public trust in science, my instinct is to assume it’s lacking, and that this absence fuels the divide we see today. But this discussion challenged me to rethink that assumption and to consider what trust in science actually looks like. It pushed me to think more critically about what we can do to create a more open conversation around science that feels inclusive, welcoming, and reflective of all backgrounds and perspectives.

“The boundlessness of science can be daunting. Therefore, this often creates a divide between scientists and the people that the science affects.”

Clara McAdams, Moderator & third-year Interdisciplinary Honors student

Moderator Clara McAdams opened the conversation by reflecting on the complexity of science. She shared her own passion “for the brain and the vast amount of wonders it contains,” explaining that “science inherently invites curiosity and exploration because the subject itself is mysterious … Therefore, science also inherently invites skepticism.” The tension between curiosity and skepticism became the perfect entry point into a conversation about what public trust in science really means. And perhaps more importantly, whether science is always something that should be trusted.

As I listened to each speaker, I kept thinking back to what I’ve been learning in Dr. Maralyssa Bann’s Honors course, “Safety-Net Hospitals in the U.S.: Past, Present, and Future.” In the class, we explore how legislation, structural inequities, and historical events have shaped public health outcomes across different communities. During the panel, Dr. Bann emphasized that “we often represent the systems in which we function,” a reminder that our work is never separate from the structures that shape it. As a healthcare provider, she explained her weariness over how her field emphasizes “evidence-based medicine” without always thinking critically about what counts as ‘evidence’. She urged us to ask the deeper question of What assumptions do we make in creating the evidence? For instance, she described how many of her patients live unhoused, face food insecurity, manage multiple comorbidities, or struggle with mental health and substance use. However, these populations are rarely represented in randomized controlled trials, which serve as the gold standard of scientific research. If the evidence excludes entire populations, can we confidently call that science trustworthy? 

Another panelist, K.C. Cole expanded on this theme of trust in science, arguing that “it’s not so much the science that causes harm, but the application of it.” With her experience in journalism, she highlighted the danger of sensationalizing science. She provided the example of how research studies often include error bars to represent the uncertainty inherent in science, but media outlets often flatten those nuances into dramatic headlines. Hearing this made me think about how many people, myself included, often encounter science through social media, and how that may not be trustworthy. In fact, strengthening our trust in science requires approaching these sources with critical skepticism.

Takeaways

Walking away from the event, I found myself holding all these perspectives at once. Dr. Michelle Koutnik reminded me that trust in science is possible, and may be more present globally than we might assume. Dr. Jon Herron showed how science can become more meaningful through personal stories. Dr. Bann pushed me to question whose experiences are reflected in the evidence. And Cole called attention to the responsibility we hold as consumers and communicators of scientific information. 

Echoing Dean Ed Taylor’s closing remarks, “You say the boundlessness of science can be daunting. But let us all be curious.” This event left me feeling exactly that—daunted, yes, but deeply curious, and more committed than ever to understanding how trust, science, and humanity intersect.

Meet this year’s speakers

K.C. Cole (Physics/Journalism)
Honored for her writing by the American Institute of Physics, Cole is known for her ability to convey complex scientific ideas with a human touch, as in her best-selling book: The Universe and the Teacup: The Mathematics of Truth and Beauty. Currently “senior senior” columnist for popular media outlet, Wired, Cole has developed interdisciplinary courses bridging science, technology and culture at USC, UCLA, and now at the UW. She regularly teaches two popular UW Honors courses: “The Art of Understanding Science” and “The Science of Human Values.”

Maralyssa Bann, M.D. (Medicine)
A hospital-based Internal Medicine physician at Harborview Medical Center and Associate Professor in the Department of Medicine, Dr. Bann focuses on inpatient care rooted in equity, harm reduction, and patient-centeredness. She brings a global and interdisciplinary lens to her Honors course on “Safety-Net Hospitals in the U.S.” and study abroad program “Honors London: Socializing Medicine,” which explores the social, historical, and economic dimensions of healthcare systems around the world.

Dr. Michelle Koutnik (Environment/Glaciology)
A glaciologist whose research focuses on Greenland, Antarctica and Mars, Dr. Koutnik studies how glaciers and ice sheets respond to climate change. She’s been an active part of the UW Honors teaching community for over a decade, bringing planetary science and climate literacy to students through fieldwork-inspired courses and previous Global Challenges panels. Her most recent Honors course in Spring 2025 was “Polar Places and Spaces: Exploring the Greenland Ice Sheet.”

Dr. Jon Herron (Biology)
Dr. Herron, a Teaching Professor in Biology, is the author of Evolutionary Analysis, a widely used textbook now in its 5th edition. He designs virtual biology labs and has taught for UW Honors since 1996, leading courses like “DNA and Evolution” and “Evolution and Human Behavior.” Beloved by students, he’s a multi-year recipient of the Honors Excellence in Teaching Award — recognized for his impressive ability to inspire “non scientists” to embrace scientific discovery and thinking.

Moderator: Clara McAdams (Interdisciplinary Honors Student)
Clara is majoring in Neuroscience with a minor in Bioethics and plans to attend medical school to prepare for her work in pediatric neurology. As a Peer Facilitator, she helps new Honors students learn how to navigate the UW with an interdisciplinary mindset. Clara also leads campus tours, conducts research in the UW Medicine NICU and volunteers with the “Grey Matters” undergraduate neuroscience journal — conducting outreach that makes science more accessible to younger students.

Click here for a more comprehensive list of recommended courses, readings, and opportunities to get involved in science communication at UW!

Winter 2026 Courses

• HONORS 221 A: The Science of Human Values (5 credits) NSc, W. Instructor: K.C. Cole 
• HONORS 221 B/C: DNA & Evolution  (5) NSc, W. Instructor: John Herron
• HONORS 231 B: Improving Population Health through Social Entrepreneurship (5) SSc, DIV, W. Instructor: Akhtar Badshah

Resources

• Knowable Magazine, an award-winning digital publication from Annual Reviews, which seeks to make scientific knowledge accessible to all. Recommended by GCIT speaker K.C. Cole **
• Grey Matters,  a neuroscience outreach organization and quarterly journal founded by students at the University of Washington on the core belief that science education should be accessible to everyone, regardless of educational background. Our Honors student panelist, Clara McAdamas, works with Grey Matters’ Outreach program **

Centers & Projects underway at UW

• Community Engagement and Leadership Education (CELE) Center
• HuSCI (Husky Science Communication Initiative)

Recommended Readings

• Sustaining a Free Society: Roles and Responsibilities of Citizens, Leaders, and Schools by Roger Soder
• Public Trust in Scientists and Views on Their Role in Policymaking by Alec Tyson and Brian Kennedy (Pew Research Center)

The post Rethinking public trust in science appeared first on University of Washington Honors Program.

Looking for ways to keep this year’s Global Challenges conversation going? Explore these upcoming UW courses, readings, and opportunities to get involved in projects both on and off campus to become part of the conversation on public trust in science. 

Resources

• Science Communication Training Series from the UW Interdisciplinary Center for Exposures, Diseases, Genomics & Environment
• UW Public Health Magazine (Link to Fall 2024 Issue)
• Training, Fellowships, Coaching and Courses on Science Communication and Outreach  from the UW’s College of the Environment
• School of Public Health Blog
• Knowable Magazine, an award-winning digital publication from Annual Reviews, which seeks to make scientific knowledge accessible to all. Recommended by GCIT speaker K.C. Cole **
• Grey Matters,  a neuroscience outreach organization and quarterly journal founded by students at the University of Washington on the core belief that science education should be accessible to everyone, regardless of educational background. Our Honors student panelist, Clara McAdamas, works with Grey Matters’ Outreach program **
• FieldNotes, a student-run journal committed to showcasing undergraduate research and relevant environmental science issues

Centers & Projects Underway at UW

• Community Engagement and Leadership Education (CELE) Center
• HuSCI (Husky Science Communication Initiative)
• UW Climate Impacts Group
• UW Population Health Initiative
• UW Graduate School’s Office of Public Lectures, “Is A River Alive? Exploring the lives, deaths and rights of rivers with Robert Macfarlane.” 
• Citizen Science Projects Affiliated with the University of Washington
  • Washington Sea Grant
    • Well Education and Testing
    • State of the Oyster
    • Crab Team
    • Sound Toxins
  • Weather
    • PressureNET
    • Old Weather Project
    • Community Collaborative Rain, Hail, & Snow Network
  • Plants
    • UW Farm
    • UW Meadowatch
    • Rare Plant Monitoring Project
  • Seabirds
    • COASST Coastal Observation and Seabird Survey Team

Recommended Reading

By GCIT Speakers

• “A Climate of Stigma, Uncertainty, and Distrust: Stakeholder Perception of Barriers to SNF Placement for Patients with Opioid Use Disorder Treated with Methadone,” by Maralyssa Bann et al.
• “The atomic bomb, exile and a test of brotherly bonds: Robert and Frank Oppenheimer,” by K.C. Cole
• First You Build a Cloud by K.C. Cole
• Sympathetic Vibrations: Reflections on Physics As a Way of Life by K.C. Cole
• Evolutionary Analysis by Jon C. Herron and Scott Freeman  
• “Five Decades of Radioglaciology.” Annals of Glaciology, by Michelle Koutnik et al.

Further Recommended Reading

• Why Trust Science? by Naomi Oreskes
• Sustaining a Free Society: Roles and Responsibilities of Citizens, Leaders, and Schools by Roger Soder
• Public Trust in Scientists and Views on Their Role in Policymaking by Alec Tyson and Brian Kennedy (Pew Research Center)

The post Global Challenges 2025: What’s Next? appeared first on University of Washington Honors Program.